Let me, therefore, start by thanking you for keeping the global warming issue alive. This is an important achievement in a moment when it has already become half-forgotten. It has not happened accidently, it was and is planned. It is a part of a carefully prepared tactic of global warming alarmists how to – once and for all – win their case. In the past two decades, they tried to do the opposite. They wanted to be as loud as possible to arouse our fears, now – when the whole issue becomes more and more suspicious – it is in their interest to stop any public discussion. This is the reason why they try to pretend that “the science is settled”, that the debate is over. We should not let them do it. [...]The general idea is that the alarmists have already succeeded in indoctrinating a whole generation of children and have already gotten many crazy regulations in place so now it is time to work the back channels: the politicians and the courts.
The undeniable fact is that almost from one day to the next the global warming debate ceased to be fashionable. It disappeared from the headlines. It may weaken the position of the global warming fundamentalists but it makes it more difficult for us, the “deniers” or “skeptics”, as they call us, to motivate people to think about this issue and to openly and politically express their views about the irrational, human freedom curtailing, human prosperity undermining measures and policies introduced by the political establishments in most of the countries of the world in the last two decades, not to speak about the measures prepared for the future. We have to keep repeating that our planet is determined not only by anthropogenic influences but dominantly by long term exogenous and endogenous natural processes and that most of them are beyond any human control.
The alarmism has subsided, they want to make it “low profile”.
Forum for discussion and essays on a wide range of subjects including technology, politics, economics, philosophy, and partying.
Search This Blog
Thursday, May 24, 2012
Low Profile Warming
In a recent speech at a conference on global warming sponsored by the Heartland Institute, climate skeptic Vaclav Klaus say he thinks that climate alarmists are changing their approach (emphasis added by Klaus):
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
It's the left's M.O. and how we got where we are today.
Q. Incrementalism: is there anything it can't do?
A. No.
I'm actually a huge fan of incrementalism.
I just want to go in the exact opposite direction.
What you want is decrementalism. Me too. ;-}
Decrementalism. I like that.
Except it doesn't seem positive somehow. :-)
The general idea is that the alarmists have already succeeded in indoctrinating a whole generation of children and have already gotten many crazy regulations in place so now it is time to work the back channels: the politicians and the courts.
I'm not sure the indoctrination has stuck. Certainly it isn't for want of trying; however, Warmenism, as a materialistic religion, must make consequential predictions. Unfortunately, its religious aspect (belief in a certain outcome while remaining in substantial ignorance about the means to that end) ensured that the vast majority of its predictions are wrong.
It is communism redux.
Post a Comment